Defense Moves for Mistrial in NJ Bridgegate Case | NBC 7 San Diego
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Defense Moves for Mistrial in NJ Bridgegate Case

The motion for a mistrial comes on the fourth day of jury deilberations

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Defense attorneys have asked for a mistrial in the case of two former Chris Christie allies accused of plotting to close access lanes to the George Washington Bridge in a political revenge plot against Fort Lee's Democratic mayor for not endorsing the Republican New Jersey governor's re-election bid. (Published Thursday, Nov. 3, 2016)

    Editor's Note: In an earlier version of this story, it was erroneously reported the judge had denied the defense motion for mistrial. The judge denied a defense motion to reconsider her instructions to the jury on the top conspiracy count, not the mistrial motion, which is outstanding.

    A federal jury went home Thursday without reaching a verdict in the George Washington Bridge lane-closing trial of two former allies of Republican Gov. Chris Christie as defense attorneys sought a mistrial and to have some evidence removed from consideration.

    Four days into deliberations, the jury left the courthouse without sending any questions to the judge. That was in contrast to Tuesday's session when they raised several questions about the counts in the indictment against Bridget Kelly and Bill Baroni.

    Kelly, Christie's former deputy chief of staff, and Baroni, his top appointee to the bridge authority, are charged with scheming to use traffic jams to punish a Democratic mayor who didn't endorse Christie in 2013.

    Defense attorneys were busy for a second day filing motions with U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton. The most intriguing was a motion for a mistrial that was almost entirely blacked out. Attorneys would give no details on what the motion contained, and Wigenton allowed the prosecution to file its response to the motion under seal, away from public view.

    While Wigenton had yet to rule on the mistrial motion Thursday, she denied a motion filed Wednesday in which defense attorneys asked her to give a different answer to jurors' questions about the top conspiracy count in the indictment.

    The defense wanted to have jurors determine the defendants' guilt or innocence based on whether the government proved there was a plot to retaliate against Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich.

    Under conspiracy law, however, the motive or intent behind a conspiracy doesn't always have to be proved; only the agreement to break the law does. In this case, the primary crime alleged was misusing the property of an organization receiving federal benefits — the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates the bridge.

    In a related motion filed Thursday, defense attorneys sought to have Wigenton instruct jurors to ignore evidence the government presented that purportedly showed the defendants also tried to retaliate against Democratic Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop for not endorsing Christie.

    Former Christie Aide Defends Emails in Bridgegate TrialFormer Christie Aide Defends Emails in Bridgegate TrialProsecutors grilled a former top aide to Governor Christie during cross examination in the so-called Bridgegate trial. Bridget Kelly is still standing by her claim that she thought it was part of a traffic study. Brian Thompson reports. (Published Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016)

    In the motion, they wrote the evidence was presented to support the prosecution's theory of punishment as a motive and noted that Wigenton has ruled jurors don't have to conclude the defendants had that motive to find them guilty of conspiracy.

    Christie has denied any knowledge of the plot and wasn't charged. But Kelly, Baroni and another Port Authority official all testified Christie was informed about the lane closings either before or while they were going on.

    The most serious charges against Kelly and Baroni carry the possibility of 20 years in prison.