Judge Recuses Self from Siri Patent Case

A patent lawsuit against Apple's virtual assistant, Siri, was delayed because the judge assigned to the case recused himself -- likely because he owned stock in the Cupertino, Calif. company, according to reports.

CNET reported that District Court Judge Gary Sharpe stepped down Tuesday citing the law, "Any conduct that would lead a reasonable [person] knowing all the circumstances to the conclusion that the judge's 'impartiality might reasonably be questioned' is a basis for the judge's disqualification." (As is typical, the "interest" Sharpe had isn't known, it probably means something  innocuous. It could even mean he owns shares of Apple.) District Judge David Hurd will now take over the lawsuit. 

The case was filed against Apple by Dynamic Advances, a Texas company which owns the '798 Patent with deals with voice recognition technology. The owner, Erich Spangenberg, "is known for a 'sue first, ask questions later' approach to patent infringement."

Contact Us