Australian Man Loses Bullying-by-Farting Court Case - NBC 7 San Diego
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Australian Man Loses Bullying-by-Farting Court Case

The man testified that he had moved out of a communal office space to avoid his supervisor's flatulence

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Australian Man Loses Bullying-by-Farting Court Case
    Ellen Smith/AAP Image via AP
    Workplace bullying claimant David Hingst covers his face as he leaves the Court of Appeal in Melbourne, Australia Friday, March 29, 2019. The Australian appeals court on Friday dismissed a bullying case brought by the engineer Hingst who accused his former supervisor of repeatedly breaking wind toward him.

    An Australian appeals court on Friday dismissed a bullying case brought by an engineer who accused his former supervisor of repeatedly breaking wind toward him.

    The Victoria state Court of Appeal upheld a Supreme Court judge's ruling that even if engineer David Hingst's allegations were true, flatulence did not necessarily constitute bullying.

    Hingst said he would take his case to the High Court, Australia's final court of appeal.

    The 56-year-old is seeking 1.8 million Australian dollars ($1.3 million) damages from his former Melbourne employer, Construction Engineering.

    'You Never Get Over It': 20 Years After Columbine

    [NATL] 'You Never Get Over It': A Look Back 20 Years After Columbine

    Family, friends, teachers and survivors look back twenty years after Columbine, in an anniversary made tougher by a threat from a South Florida high schooler. 

    (Published Friday, April 19, 2019)

    Hingst testified that he had moved out of a communal office space to avoid supervisor Greg Short's flatulence.

    Hingst told the court that Short would then enter Hingst's small, windowless office several times a day and break wind.

    Hingst "alleged that Mr. Short would regularly break wind on him or at him, Mr. Short thinking this to be funny," the two appeal court judges wrote in their ruling.

    Hingst said he would spray Short with deodorant and called his supervisor "Mr. Stinky."

    "He would fart behind me and walk away. He would do this five or six times a day," Hingst said outside court.

    Short told the court he did not recall breaking wind in Hingst's office, "but I may have done it once or twice."

    Mueller Report: 10 Instances of Possible Obstruction of Justice by Trump

    [NATL] Mueller Report: 10 Instances of Possible Obstruction of Justice by Trump

    Special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election included instances of potential obstruction by President Donald Trump. Here is a rundown of the ten mentioned in the report.

    (Published Thursday, April 18, 2019)

    Hingst also accused Short of being abusive over the phone, using profane language and taunting him.

    The appeal judges found Hingst "put the issue of Mr. Short's flatulence to the forefront" of his bullying case, arguing that "flatulence constituted assaults."

    The court found that Short did not bully or harass Hingst. Hingst had failed to establish that Construction Engineering had been negligent.

    Hingst worked for Construction Engineering as a contract administrator from May 2008 until April 2009.

    He argues he was bullied in the workplace until his job was terminated.

    Construction Engineering argued his job was terminated because of a downturn in construction work due to the global financial crisis in late 2008.

    Trump Celebrates Mueller Report as Democrats Plan Next Step

    [NATL] Trump Celebrates Mueller Report as Democrat Lawmakers Plan Next Step

    President Donald Trump celebrated the release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report into Russia collusion today, but Democrats say this story isn't over and are already talking about their next step. The report, which totals over 400 pages, neither condemns nor exonerates the president.

    (Published Thursday, April 18, 2019)