SAN DIEGO -- There may be more "environmentally superior" options to the controversial Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project, according to a new report from the California Public Utilities Commission.The CPUC released a draft document Thursday of the environmental impacts of the proposed 150-mile project. The joint study with the Bureau of Land Management identified 27 alternatives to San Diego Gas and Electric Co.'s plan.The project involves a proposed 150-mile power line that would run from El Centro through the Anza-Borrego Desert, across Ramona and into parts of San Diego. The line would cost about $1.3 billion. SDG&E has maintained its plan is the best option.
But the joint report suggests an alternative route along Interstate 8. "This proposed southern route alternative heads west from the Imperial Valley area and cuts north after 36 miles, thus avoiding Anza-Borrego and the high fire-risk areas," the CPUC said.The alternative is also 40 miles shorter.The public has 90 days to review the draft report and provide comments to the CPUC and BLM. There will also be eight public workshops between Jan. 28 and Feb. 1 to be held in Alpine, Borrego Springs, El Centro, Pine Valley, Ramona, San Diego, Temecula, and Warner Springs.To view the complete report, click here.SDG&E officials insist the county would benefit from the power line by helping to lower energy costs, cutting back on greenhouse emissions, improving energy reliability in the region and expanding access to clear, renewable energy sources.Opponents say the area's power needs can be met through other, smaller projects.Previous Stories:
