Prop Zero
The Starting Point for Commentary and Coverage of California Politics

Excuse Me. Is That Budget Constitutional?

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print

Over-the-top declarations can provoke, but they are not the most provocative rhetoric in politics.

 A good question is.

Assembly Republicans, in a letter to Attorney General Kamala Harris, have asked a very good question: is the California state budget passed at the end of June constitutional?

The question stems from a deal on education funding and policy that was at the heart of the larger budget deal.

Gov. Brown and the Democrats undertook a manuever that attempted to lower the constitutional education funding guarantee, first approved by voters as Prop 98 in 1988.

In return for not challenging this legally questionable act, teachers' unions won a variety of new concessions on education policy, including legislation that prevents teacher layoffs -- legislation so inflexible that local school boards are howling.

Assembly Republicans are interested in this question because of the leverage Prop 98 provides them.

Prop 98 requires a two-thirds vote to suspend the education funding guarantee.

But the manuever that was part of the budget passed with a majority vote. Republicans want to know if the manuever was effectively a suspension of Prop 98 -- and thus should have required a two-thirds vote.

Who is right?

Anything involving the famously complicated Prop 98 is difficult to answer, but Republicans have a pretty decent case that the two-thirds vote in Prop 98 was violated.

That said, since that two-thirds vote is bad policy because it makes budgets so difficult to do, here's hoping that this manuever is upheld -- and creates a precedent for future attempts to get around Prop 98's provisions.

The legislature is so hemmed in by the constitution and a budget system full of difficult provisions that almost any hole it can punch in the system, and any method it can use to get a bit more discretion, is healthy.

Leave Comments